
While I was in college (a hazy time to recall, I admit), I wrote my thesis on the propagation of societal omni-myths (ie. the stuff Campbell liked to blather on about) via modern myth-making tools (ie. stuff like comic books, pulp magazines, etc.) during times of societal stress.
I majored in Anthropology. Stop giving me that look.
Anyway, my point was that the basic myth-heroes (the strong/civilized/royal man, the cunning/natural/common man, etc.) that all societies hold in common had evolved along with society, becoming something seemingly different, yet still remaining undeniably the same at their most basic. And, while they were evolving towards a more complex form, they underwent periodic and
regular devolutions back into their simplistic UR-forms as the pressures on society changed.
What does this have to do with comics, you ask?
I'm getting there. Hold your ponies.
Essentially, my point was that myth-heroes changed personalities based on whether times were good or bad. Myth-heroes were heroic and relatively flawless (simple) during times of societal uncertainty, while they became more flawed and human (complex) during times when things were going well. As the good times (comparatively, anyway) became longer and the bad times shorter, myth-heroes became more complex in general.
Or, if the zeitgeist is good, heroes are bad, if the zeitgeist is bad, heroes are good. Make sense? Still with me? Cool. Moving on.
During or immediately prior to the Depression, we got the pulp heroes-Doc Savage, the Shadow, Tarzan. Batman and Superman, too. Minimal foibles, maximum heroism.
As the Depression faded into the relative prosperity of the War Years and immediately after, the modern myth-heroes became more human in both ability and personality (Doc Savage is a case in point, here-he goes from demigod to super-man to above-average man within the span of a dozen super-sagas). Things get scary in the fifties-early sixties, we get the Silver Age of comics. Batman being turned 2D by the Rainbow Creature.
The Marvel Age hits us during the turbulence of the sixties, giving us the bright and shining creations of Stan Lee...more human perhaps than their DC counterparts, but still recognizably
heroic in the 'super' sense of the word. But as society begins to stabilize, the characters begin dealing with the mundane (drugs, marital problems, etc.) as opposed to world-eaters.
The shifts continue. Political/social/economic uncertainty? The myth-heroes go to war against gods. Times are good? Our heroes struggle with ants.
The thing is, as our myth-heroes become more complex (continuity, donchaknow), the less they devolve come the bad times, making it harder to change them back into archetypes when we need them.
Hence, the nigh-constant periodic rebooting comic-book characters undergo.
At least that's my theory. What do you guys think? Am I right? Wrong?